Friday, January 25, 2008

Economy is in Dire Straits: Why and What to Expect

Usually, I'm not the type to dabble into economic speak but given that things have gone from bad to horrible in a short period of time, I thought it would be prudent to have my financial guru weigh in.


Economy in Peril


by Xen Mogul

Wake up people! We are on the verge of an unprecedented financial collapse. Oil prices have gone through the roof, consumers are over-leveraged (credit cards, mortgages, stippers...etc.) and the economy has now taken a turn for the worse. How in the world could this have happened? Well let me give you a little bit of history.

HOW

So it all started with the Nasdaq (tech) bubble of 2000. After busting early that year, it was followed the unforseen events on 9/11 which officially destroyed our economy. In response, Greenspan cut rates to 1%. This resulted in one of the biggest asset inflation cycles of recent history in real-estate and, more recently, in stocks and commodities. Through various creative financial instruments large investment banks around the world were able to add ridiculous fuel to the fire of rising asset prices (namely homes) driving prices up still further.

This huge influx of wealth generation via asset appreciation ("mortgage equity extraction") spurred massive consumer spending from the US, the global engine of growth. As the US continued to buy stuff the emerging markets (China, India...etc.) profited by making the products for us. This spurred significant growth and wealth generation in their respective economies which sparked a sudden domestic economic growth spurt. All of this further drove up asset valuation around the world as these countries were buying infinitely more of the basics than ever before (coal, iron ore, food...) driving global prices even higher.

NOW

Now the party is over. Home prices are falling and people are defaulting on their mortgages and more recently on their credit card bills. Because of the above mentioned financial instruments, the effect of these declines has a multiplier effect...a multiple so large few can really get their head around it (myself included). Think trillions, not billions. To put this number into perspective...US GDP is $14.5tr; China GDP is about $2.6tr; and Global GDP is about $45tr.

Leverage has been the name of the game for the last five years because the cost of borrowing money has been so cheap. The housing crisis and the resulting loss of unprecedented sums of money has resulted in the loan market to freeze up for some and get much more expensive for most (all this in spite of Fed rate cuts). This is simply because banks don't trust other banks enough in this environment to lend them money. All of this, among other factors, has spiraled us into what I believe will be one of the most difficult times in recent history. The risks are large enough and systemic enough to cause a economic crash.

The Future

Make no mistake about what the government is doing. I'm sure you've heard that they've proposed a "Stimulus Plan" to the tune of $145 billion. This is a sign of absolute desperation. They're trying to avoid a DEPRESSION not a recession. They're scum and judging by their past performance I'm willing to bet this won't work. It will only devalue the currency as they create this money out of thin air.

The next shoes to fall will be credit card and auto defaults and eventually private equity deals. The banks that loaned the money to these retards are going to take it up the booty over the next couple years. People are getting laid-off everywhere and unemployment figures will inevitably rise as lending standards and prices tighten and asset prices deflate. Some argue that the emerging markets have developed local economies strong enough to keep growth rates up in those regions but I disagree. I expect to see them slow appreciably albeit not come to a halt.
As they say, "when the US gets a cold, the world gets the flu."

The flip side of all this, what could make me wrong, is that by some miracle we're able to get the loan market working again and bring lending rates down so people and businesses can re-finance. If this happens we will be ok, but it will still take a long time to recover from the losses we've already incurred. It's all about the US consumer. That's the whole game. When we spend we fuel growth and, unfortunately, right now our wallets are getting tighter not bigger.

Remember that it's in nobody's interest to tell you that stocks are going lower...their jobs are at risk (the media included). So they'll tell you that everything will be fine and not even address the full scope of the risks.

The net of it all...stay out of stocks, hoard your cash and brace yourselves for what could be very difficult times in America. If everything turns around and the market doubles from here, I'm sorry. But if you have no chips you can't play poker. Good luck.

Technorati Tags:



Wednesday, January 23, 2008

Brawn over Brains - Philip Rivers, LaDainian Tomlinson, and Toughness in Pro Sports

Picture this scenario: two secretaries get hired by a well-known law firm, and work there for several years. One (let's call him Phil) is somewhat of an underachiever, and is notorious for his surly attitude. The other (let's call him LT) represents the firm with class and dignity, and is the most efficient worker they've ever had. One day, they both come down with injuries while typing. Phil has a torn ligament in his wrist, while LT is in the early stages of developing carpal tunnel syndrome. They both need time off, but the firm's biggest client goes on trial in one week. Phil decides to fight through his tremendous pain, because the person who would take over his work (William E. Volek) isn't trusted by anybody in the firm. LT takes the necessary time off, comforted by the fact that his replacement is infinitely better than Phil's, and can help the company get through its busy time. After the trial, everyone hails Phil's courage, even though the damage in his wrist is so severe that he might not be able to work when they next need him. LT is condemned for his choice, even though he decreased his risk of suffering a long-term injury by getting adequate rest. Despite the fact that LT is an all-time great secretary, and had only called in sick once before in his career, he will forever be remembered for failing to come through in that one week, and his years of hard work become tainted in the process.

Seems kind of rough, no? How many of us would do what LT did, and make sure to avoid long-term injury in order to continue earning a good living for their family? This situation came to fruition this past Sunday in the AFC Championship Game, when San Diego's future Hall-of-Fame running back, LaDainian Tomlinson, carried the ball only twice against New England due to a sprained medial collateral ligament in his knee. Their inconsistent quarterback, Philip Rivers, played the whole game with a completely torn anterior cruciate ligament in his knee, and actually had preliminary surgery six days before in a last ditch effort to play. It's possible that he won't be back in time for their next training camp, as recovery time for this injury can last up to eight months. As expected, Rivers has been universally hailed for his courage, while Tomlinson has been lambasted by fans and media members alike. The obvious question that emerges is this: why do we expect so much from pro athletes? In no other area of life would we debate this dilemma. If you have an injury, and it's going to affect your production, you take time off to heal. Case closed. However, if you play pro sports, and especially pro football, it isn't enough to just be good at your job. You also have to have a level of toughness that's acceptable to not only your teammates, but to the millions of people on their couches who watch and criticize what you do.

We as fans always expect a superhuman effort from our athletes. We demand it, since they charge us so much for tickets, and especially since the athletes get paid such ludicrous amounts of money. So this past Sunday, everyone wanted to see the Chargers play the Patriots with their full complement of starters. We wanted LaDainian to tough it out, since his presence would have made the game better. The problem is that there are plenty of instances when athletes did risk it all, and never were the same again. We always seem to forget that Bill Walton felt such pressure to play through injury that he went against his personal beliefs in the '78 playoffs and took pain killers in order to deal with his foot problems. We also seem to forget that over the next five years, he missed 3 full seasons, and played in only 14 and 33 games in the other two. We also forget that NFL players are more prone to depression, arthritis, and an assortment of other mental and physical problems when their careers are over, because they take risks similar to the one Rivers took. So while I respect Rivers' toughness, I can't use his decision as a reason to fault Tomlinson. Because there is no right or wrong way to deal with this dilemma. If Rivers felt like the risk was worth it, and LaDainian didn't, then who are we to tell them otherwise? Only one thing is certain - next year, if LaDainian continues to break records, while Rivers struggles to make it back from his injury, people will finally acknowledge the complexity of this issue, which isn't as clear-cut as it's currently being presented.

Technorati Tags:



Tuesday, January 22, 2008

Eddie Murphy Predicted Giants Victory 20 Years Ago!!

We all knew that Eddie Murphy was hilarious, but did you know he was psychic too? Exactly 20 years ago Eddie predicted the Giants would triumph over the Packers. Take a look.




Wow! I haven't see Eddie exude this much oneness with the world since his 1998 classic Holy Man.

Sunday, January 20, 2008

Michael Jackson Comeback in 2008!

Granted, it won't be easy but anyone who thinks that the King of Pop is down for the count doesn't know Jack(o).

Let's for a minute forget about the child molestation charges. Forget about the ridiculous amount of plastic surgeries that have transformed this previously handsome young black man. Because, as we all know, this is America and as history continues to show anyone can make a comeback. And all it takes is a hit record. So I've decided to get my executive producer on and come up with a list of producers to put the King of Pop back on his throne.

Rodney Jerkins

Notable Hits

Brandy & Monica - The Boy is Mine
Michael Jackson - You Rock My World
Janet Jackson - Feedback
Destiny's Child - Say My Name/Lose My Breath
Beyonce - Deja Vu


Of course, Rodney Jerkins is the first guy to mention. He's a certified hit machine. He's worked with Michael before and he can change styles very quickly, delivering club-thumping joints for Destiny's Child, Brandy, etc. while also making traditional smooth R&B for Ciara, Keyshia Cole, Joe and others. He should produce 3 for MJ's next one, 2 smoothed out R&B tracks and one monster club track.



Timbaland

Notable Hits

Aaliyah- Are you that Somebody/We Need a Resolution etc.
Ginuwine - Pony/What's So Different etc
Justin Timberlake - Cry Me a River, What Goes Around
Timbaland - Apologize/The Way I Are
Nelly Furtado - Say It Right/Promiscuous
Missy Elliott - Get Ur Freak On/She's a Bi*ch




Steroid allegations aside, Timbo is King. So why wouldn't the King of Pop work with, arguably, the most innovative producer of our time? The argument against it is that he would be biting Justin Timberlake's style, as Timbo almost exclusively produces for the King of Blue-Eyed Soul. I would argue against that considering Timbaland switches up his style like it's his job (incidentally it is his job). And besides, JT swagger-jacked MJ first.


Raphael Saadiq


Notable Hits

D'angelo - Lady
Total - Kissin You
Angie Stone - Brotha
Kelis - Glow
Mos Def - The Boogie Man Song
Raphael Saadiq - Still Ray/Get Involved
The Roots - What they Do
Tony Toni Tone - Feels Good/If I Had No Loot/Anniversary, etc.
Bilal - Soul Sista




One of the best R & B soul producers of our time. There are very few artists/producers that have the longevity of a Raphael Saadiq. Dude's been around since Tony Toni Tone. He even made Kelis sound soulful. MJ should not be as challenging. After all, we might forget but MJ used to be quite the crooner. If he can put the soul back into his music, it'll sound a little more credible than the endless stream of "pop" songs.



Neptunes

Notable Hits

Sade - By Your Side (remix)
NERD - Run to the Sun
Kelis - Caught Out There/Milkshake
Justin Timberlake - Like I Love You/Nothin Else
Britney Spears - I'm a Slave 4 U/ Boys



It blows my mind that MJ somehow skipped the Neptunes when they were in their prime. Granted, they're still big hitmakers but they are not every third song on the radio like they were in 2001. That's probably a good thing though. At any rate, they are so good at making hits that MJ would be a fool to not work with them.



Mark Ronson


Notable Hits

Daniel Merriweather - Stop Me
Amy Winehouse - Rehab/You Know I'm No Good/Valerie
Ghostface - Ooh Wee
Mark Ronson -Version

Mark Ronson will probably be the least obvious producer of the ones I've listed but MJ's needed to step outside of the box for awhile now. The previous producers are pretty safe choices. In particular, I'd like to hear him produce something disco/house influenced. Let's not forget that some of MJ's best music came out of the disco era.

Bryan Michael Cox

Notable Hits

Mary J. Blige - Be Without You/We Ride
Usher - Confessions/Confessions Pt II/Burn
Mariah Carey - Shake It Off
Chris Brown - Fallen Angel
Marques Houston - Circles
Danity Kane - Ride For You







BMC
, as I like to call him, single-handedly took Mary J. Blige from an amazing singer to an icon with 2006's smash "Be Without You." BMC is a genius when it comes to the poppy R&B tracks that get stuck in your head. Who would be better for MJ's second single?



Other producers to consider: Rich Harrison, Just Blaze, WIll.I.Am, Polow Da Don, Danger Mouse.

Technorati Tags:



Wednesday, January 16, 2008

Kobe, the Horri-Bulls, and the sad tale of Eminem

A few random notes to get you through hump day:

I was sifting through the NBA standings today, and three things stood out:

1 - Everybody in Miami should be embarrassed, as the Heat are an astonishing 8-28. 8-28!! I know D-Wade is banged up, and Shaq is a shadow of his former self, but it's a complete disgrace for them to have a worse record than the New York Knicks. Pat Riley seems to be already planning his exit strategy, and Dwyane Wade has become as injury prone as his out-of-shape running mate. There seems to be no end in site to their misery.
2 - My beloved Bulls continue to stumble, and currently sit 11th in the Eastern Conference at 14-22. Let's just move on...
3 - The number one seed in the West is...the Los Angeles Lakers. I'm as stunned as you are. Granted, there are a bunch of teams jumbled at the top, and the Lakers are about to drop with the loss of their phenom center, Andrew Bynum, for a minimum of eight weeks, but we have to credit their GM for making the best of a bad situation when Kobe Bryant demanded a trade in the offseason. Mitch Kupchak could have caved in to Kobe and received ten cents on the dollar in a trade with the Suns, Knicks, or Bulls. Instead, he stuck to his guns, and now he has a potential contender in the next few years. Also, he appreciated Bynum's talent last year, and smartly refused to deal him for Jason Kidd, who, while still occasionally spectacular, would be a horrible fit in the triangle offense. According to John Hollinger's PER ratings, Bynum is the 16th ranked player in the league this year, while Kidd is all the way down at 82.

And finally, I came across this story when looking at Bill Simmons' weekly links on espn.com: apparently, Eminem is now weighing in at over 200 pounds (which is bad considering he's 5'7"), and his depression, isolation, and unhealthiness have people fearing for his life. I remember listening to his songs on the 8 Mile Soundtrack, which came on the heels of his best full-length LP, The Eminem Show, and thinking that he did the impossible - he lived up to his enormous hype. Fast-forward to 2008, and do you know anybody who would get excited about a new Eminem record? I know fame is fleeting, but this is just sad...

Tags:

Sunday, January 13, 2008

"The Greatest [fill in the blank] of All Time"

When the New England Patriots defeated Jacksonville on Saturday, they came one step closer to being inevitably crowned "The Greatest Team of All Time" by all the pundits in the sports world. The logic is simple: if they finish with the best record ever, and they break all the records, then they must be better than anybody who has ever played. As a fan of the record-setting '95-96 Chicago Bulls, it pains me to say this, but that logic is incredibly simplistic and short-sided. It still shocks me that people don't grasp the concept of relative dominance among sports teams. The Patriots, with their amazing point differential and record breaking offense, are the most dominant team ever relative to the league that they played in. If the Pats played in the '70s against Noll's Steelers, Shula's Dolphins, or Madden's Raiders, there's no guarantee that they would even come out of the AFC, much less go undefeated. Clearly, we're watching a dominant team, but should they be considered greater than the '85 Bears just because they have one less loss on their record?
The larger issue is that with today's 24-7 news cycle, it's not enough to just say that we're watching a great football team. We have to hear hours of debate about where this team ranks in history, whether Tom Brady is the greatest QB of all time, and whether Bill Belichick is, in fact, the devil. The Brady debate is the perfect illustration of the reactionary nature of today's media. Before the season, you would have a hard time finding any expert calling Brady a better quarterback than Peyton Manning. Peyton had finally filled the one glaring hole in his resume by winning the Super Bowl last year, making everyone forget his history of big-game failures. Brady, who already had three Super Bowl victories to his name prior to Manning's breakthrough, was highly regarded but largely ignored. This was despite the fact that he had the likes of Reche Caldwell and Jabar Gaffney as his primary receivers, and was simply the result of him not winning the most recent Super Bowl. After his receiving corps was drastically improved in the offseason, Brady had a record setting year, and suddenly he's not only regarded higher than Manning, but also every other quarterback who has ever played the game. At this rate, we're one more New York Giants victory away from Eli being the greatest Manning of all time. So while I have the utmost respect for Brady, there's no way we can call him the best ever just after his 30th birthday. There's nothing wrong with waiting until his career is over before figuring out his (and Peyton's) place in history.

Technorati Tags:

Saturday, January 12, 2008

The poetry of Mrs. Clinton

Prose is a form of writing that lacks the formal rules and structure of poetry. It is natural, free flowing, and without convention. Unlike poetry, prose is neither constrained by the chains of its predecessors nor confined to rules that exist for reasons we can not explain or make sense of. Prose is prosaic, and though that may sound redundant, it means that prose represents something common, something everyday, something familiar.

So it seems to me that Hillary Clinton's allusion to Obama's campaign being "in poetry", is quite inaccurate. Barack Obama is nothing but prose. He speaks with a candor and verity that is what has lead droves of young people, like myself, to realize it's more important to have someone good than someone female, and that it's more important to have someone we can believe in than someone with a track history. Clinton's years of experience crafting her rhythm and meter, perfecting her stanzas and mastering her rhyme schemes do not impress me. Barack's prose has given me the audacity to have a little hope in a system of government that seems as inclined to serve my interests as the government of Bhutan. And for that I'm still unsure whether to thank him or curse him.

Full disclosure -- I have no specific area that I claim as my specialty. I'm no sports fanatic like Chris, nor am I a hip hop aficionado like XM. By virtue of being an american college student I know nothing about everything. But one thing I definitely do know is my genres. And Barack Obama is definitely prose.


In the words of my good buddies over at Busted Tees:


~Eri

Technorati Tags:


Friday, January 11, 2008

What the hell is up with the Media?

Far be it for me to hop on the "blame the media" bandwagon, but in the past few years the mainstream media has just gotten absurdly ridiculous (redundant?).

Let's look at what's been happening:

  • Rise in coverage of Sensationalist Journalism (i.e. Anna Nicole, Imus, Michael Richards)

  • Openly partisan news organizations (i.e Fox News)

  • The emergence of Reality TV (Tila Tequila, Kardashians, Flavor Flav)

  • Obsession with the private lives of celebrities (Britney, LiLoh, Paris)
  • The Internet serving to inform (specifically bloggers and YouTube)

That, my friends, is the perfect recipe for disaster.

Try watching any of the top 3 news organizations(CNN, Fox News, MSNBC) during primetime and you'll notice that you don't get news from these people, you get news infused with opinion. Of course since most Americans are uninformed they form their opinions based on how the news is presented to them.

Example:

Bill Clinton last week, while in NH campaigning on the trail for his wife, made a joke saying about Hillary "I cant make her taller, younger, male" and the media pounced on it claiming that Bill Clinton was playing the gender card and some even suggesting that Bill might be trying to sabotage her campaign.


Why would news organizations (and reputable ones at that) infuse so much bias and opinion into their stories? My answer would be the Bill O'Reilly effect.

When Bill-O arrived to Fox News he brought with him a brash attitude, partisan monologues, and a penchant for cutting off his guest's microphones. And you know what happened? The ratings went through the roof. Since then it seems that the news has been more interested in entertaining than informing.

Thus we have weeks of coverage on Anna Nicole, and Don Imus and Paris' jail stint, Britney's VMA performance and her child custody case and blah blah blah........

(Sidebar: I saw Lindsay Lohan's father outside of my office today and recognized who he was. Just another glaring example of the extent of her overexposure.)

I barely heard any news about the hundreds of deaths in Kenya that have shaken up one of the few stable countries in Africa. On the plus side, I did get to hear a lot about Hillary crying though.

As much as I mock the news though, it's more important than ever. What with the emergence of blogs and YouTube as expedient sources of news and information, the Edward R Murrow standard of journalism gets thrown to the wayside by shleps like me whose random ramblings entertain and inform with little accountability. That's why I'm harshest on the mainstream media. Because now is when they should be more accurate and unbiased than ever instead of emulating the blogging generation.

Just my thoughts.

To backtrack to the obsession with celebrity and Hollywood, the series finale of Extras had an amazing ending. If you're not familiar with the show, it's about a couple of British actors who are film extras looking to come up. Well in the finale, our main character, played expertly by Ricky Gervais, achieves success as a big comic TV star and, of course, lets it go to his head. So he becomes a Hollywood prick, turning down roles that he deems beneath him until he becomes a D-list actor. This forces him to do the only thing that will bring back his fame, a reality show.

Anyway, the final scene is great as he comes to a realization that all of the fame and popularity don't really matter. And not in a cheesy puffy way, but in a realistic gut-wrenching performance.

Thursday, January 10, 2008

Proof That I Was Certain Hillary Would be Crushed in NH

Ok, so now I think enough time has passed and I can look back and laugh at myself, along with the pollsters/pundits/press, about my ridiculous presumptions concerning the New Hampshire primary. I, like everyone else, was pretty certain Hillary would lose. And not just lose, but a Mortal Kombat "flawless victory" then "Finish Him" kind of loss.

So I wrote this blog just a few hours before the voting booths closed on Tuesday. Of course, I tried to erase it immediately and replace it with this after hearing the news but unfortunately I was caught by a few readers who've since asked me to repost it. So here you go.


The 5 Moments that Killed Hillary's Campaign
(written 4 hours before voting booths closed)



Unless you've been living under a rock for the past week, the mainstream media and bloggers alike have been delighting in the concurrent rise of Barack Obama and the downfall of the one-time-invincible Hillary Clinton. Myself included. Sure, it's not over yet. But following an almost-certain defeat in New Hampshire today and another almost-certain loss in South Carolina (provided Obama does not have any serious gaffes) I feel less nervous predicting her defeat.

But before we carve Ms Clinton's epitaph, we've got to write her eulogy. So here it is folks. The five moments that lost Hillary the nomination.

5. Hillary's furious rant about change.

In this frightening moment during the ABC/Facebook debate in New Hampshire, Hillary did what she knew she would have to do following her loss in Iowa- she went after Obama. She started her attack directly but not in personal terms saying that Obama claimed to be against lobbyists but has one on his staff, that he claimed to be against the Patriot Act then voted to keep it in place, and that he was against the war but continued to vote to fund it. She concluded saying Obama "could have a debate with himself" considering how much he's switched his positions. All very strong points and delivered to perfection. She then looked to get John Edwards to join in on a tag team by mentioning that Obama said Edwards was "unelectable" and "inconsistent" on a number of issues. What followed next Hillary could not have been prepared for. John Edwards responded, but instead of responding to the charges leveled at him, he sided with Obama, saying the following:

Now, what I would say this: Any time you speak out powerfully for change, the forces of status quo attack. That's exactly what happens. It's fine to have a disagreement about health care. To say that Senator Obama is having a debate with himself from some Associated Press story I think is just not - that's not the kind of discussion we should be having. I think that every time this happens, what will occur - every time he speaks out for change, every time I fight for change, the forces of status quo are going to attack - every single time. . . I mean, I didn't hear these kind of attacks from Senator Clinton when she was ahead. Now that she's not, we hear them.

Hillary then responded with a tirade that made her look insane. Her eyes were literally bulging out of her head and she was slamming her hand around in defiance. Take a gander.



This would certainly be higher on my list but since it followed an already sinking ship it only makes number 5 on my list.

4. Hillary attacking Obama for having presidential aspirations in kindergarten.

In early December as Obama's polls began to bring him closer to Hillary, she thought it would be a good idea to start going at Obama a bit more aggressively. On her website, Hillary stated the following in an article entitled, "Sen. Obama Rewrites History, Claims He Hasn't Been Planning White House Run"

Today in Iowa, Senator Barack Obama said: "I have not been planning to run for President for however number of years some of the other candidates have been planning for."
Oh really?

"Senator Obama's comment today is fundamentally at odds with what his teachers, family, classmates and staff have said about his plans to run for President," Clinton spokesperson Phil Singer said. "Senator Obama's campaign rhetoric is getting in the way of his reality."

In third grade, Senator Obama wrote an essay titled 'I Want To Be a President.' His third grade teacher: Fermina Katarina Sinaga "asked her class to write an essay titled 'My dream: What I want to be in the future.' Senator Obama wrote 'I want to be a President,' she said." [The Los Angeles Times, 3/15/07]

In kindergarten, Senator Obama wrote an essay titled 'I Want to Become President.' "Iis Darmawan, 63, Senator Obama's kindergarten teacher, remembers him as an exceptionally tall and curly haired child who quickly picked up the local language and had sharp math skills. He wrote an essay titled, 'I Want To Become President,' the teacher said."

This sounds like something that would come out of SNL. It's that ridiculous. It would probably have gotten higher on my list if people had realized that she was, in fact, being completely serious.

3. Bill Clinton on Obama on Charlie Rose

Following all of the positive press that Obama was getting after the Oprah event, Bill Clinton thought that it would be a good idea to help out Hillary by throwing in his 2 cents on Obama. While completely patronizing Obama by saying that he is a "great politician" Bill went on to call a vote for Obama a "risk" and " a roll of the dice. " To many it looked like something out of the Rove playbook and made Hillary look like she needed her hubby to help her fight her battles when she'd already positioned herself on her own. By all accounts a bad move.




2. Clinton adviser says Republicans will use Obama's drug use as a youth to beat him in general election



Bill Shaheen, one of Hillary's top advisers, came out and said this speaking about Obama:

"The Republicans are not going to give up without a fight ... and one of the things they're certainly going to jump on is his drug use. . .It'll be, 'When was the last time? Did you ever give drugs to anyone? Did you sell them to anyone?' There are so many openings for Republican dirty tricks. It's hard to overcome."
The comment was especially despicable considering that Obama has been forthright about his drug-riddled past (see" Yes, I inhaled. That was the point.") and even wrote about it in his bestselling book. Of course this bounced back on to Hillary and Shaheen 'voluntarily' resigned. A day later, Hillary got caught saying that she forced him to resign. The whole situation made her campaign look desperate. This resonated especially hard since it was the first sign that Hillary's camp was truly worried about Obama.

1. Hillary flubs question of driver's licenses for illegal immigrants


True, this is not nearly as sensational as the others, but this was the first crack in Hillary's impenetrable armor. For nine months Hillary was smooth sailing. Yeah, people talked about Obama here and there, but it was all about Hillary. She seemed to win every debate effortlessly and Obama and Edwards got lost amongst the shuffle amongst folks like Mike Gravel and Chistopher Dodd. And then this happened.
NY Governor Eliot Spitzer came up with the idea to give driver's licenses to illegal immigrants. Hillary supported it. A day later the press got wind of it and she realized that it was probably a bad move politically so she came on the debate stage and tried to have it both ways. By the end of her answer no one knew where she stood and for the first time, everyone smelt blood.

What do you think?

Wednesday, January 9, 2008

Bangin' New Janet Jackson Joint

I know what you're thinking. Janet Jackson? It sounds ridiculous since she hasn't put out anything hot in awhile but this track is just fire. Sort of old-school Janet meets new sound.I can already see this on rull surrious rotation. Plus the video is on point.

Beat is banging. Sort of a more advanced Sexy Back. Produced by Rodney Jerkins. This cat always amazes me, coming back with a huge smash every couple of years with a reinvented sound. Also, peep Janet getting her T- Pain on.

Remember where you heard it first!

Janet Jackson - Feedback